Posts Tagged ‘Kevin Gillese’

Fringe Reviews 2011: Scratch (Recommended)

If you’re a fan of improv and you haven’t seen Scratch, why?

No, seriously, why? You should fix that.

Seriously, though, these guys are great. I’m not a huge fan of improv myself, but the story these guys weaved out of 3 random audience ideas was hilarious. It’s not conventional improv. They don’t do short scenes and act them out and then get new ideas. They take three ideas and create an interconnected set of three stories based on them. Fun results.

Go see it.

Fringelog 2010: The Supervillain Monologues ***1/2

Supervillain Monologues is pretty much exactly what you’d expect out of the title. A series of sketches on supervillains. Some of them are good, some of them not so good. My favorite was one about a villain named The Edmontonian, who’s thing was trying to destroy Calgary (“who do you think tinkered with your city planning to make your streets make NO SENSE?!”). Also the Portuguese Hamburgler, who’s thing was stealing and then fornicating with Big Macs.

But there were several stories that I just found incredibly dull. Unfortunately including the linking story, Dr. Impossible. It didn’t really go anywhere and never held my attention. I just wanted the next sketch with puppets to start.

Fringelog 2010: Fairy Tales Scratched ***1/2

This is the kind of play that results from a collection of improv actors writing a scripted play. Much like good improv, the play is hilarious because it is chock full of hilarious standalone moments. I couldn’t even count the number of times this play had the entire audience laughing uproariously at something happening on stage. A line that stood out for me, as being both funny and a defining line of the entire play, was “it’s eat or be eaten in the Enchanted fucking Forest!” There were much much funnier lines and sight gags, but that really covers the whole concept of a modern retelling of Red Riding Hood, The Three Little Pigs, and Jack and the Beanstalk complete with drugs, sex, murder, and every other sin under the sun.

Where it falls short, though, is in the frame story around all those hilarious moments. The mashup of those three stories into one is, unfortunately, largely incoherent, overly complex, and generally just a little too twisted (though that supplied a lot of its best moments). There were a couple of points where one of the actors even self-consciously pointed out the lack of funny in some of his lines (it’s entirely possible that’s part of the script, but either way it feels like an admission of discomfort at doing scripted theatre in this group).

I also found it a bit frustrating that at various points, different actors would play the same character. This is fine in short improv sketches, but in an hour long play it can make things a bit more difficult to follow.

I feel a bit conflicted at knocking the play for this, because it really was really really funny. But, at the same time I feel like it didn’t really achieve its goals. It might have been better left as improv with some audience participation to decide how the mashup would have worked. As is, I just felt like I was just seeing some improv that I had no way to participate in.

I think I’ll be seeing this group’s actual improv show (Scratch) at some point during the Fringe, and this play has made me more excited to do so. And I think the script shows promise, it just needed to be narrowed down in scope a bit.